U.S. Copyright Office
Library of Congress
Reply Comments on Anticirumvention Exemptions

Rulemaking on Exemptions from Prohibition on Circumvention of Technological Measures that Control Access to Copyrighted Works

The Copyright Office has received 35 reply comments in response to the notice of inquiry in this rulemaking. The Copyright Office published a Federal Register notice on February 23, 2006, for the public hearings to be held in Palo Alto, California, and in Washington, D.C., in late March and early April (see available dates for hearings). A web-based form is available for requests to testify.

Document Name/Organization Replying to Comment(s) Reply Comment
1 David Taylor, DVD Copy Control Association 2, 5, 8-16, 19, 20, 22, 24, 27, 28, 32, 33, 35, 37-39, 41, 43, 44, 47, 50, 51, 58, 60-62, 64, 65, 70, 73 comment
2 Peter Decherney, et al., University of Pennsylavania 5 comment
3 Bill D. Herman 5 comment
4 Seth Finkelstein 2 comment
5 Fred von Lohmann, Electronic Frontier Foundation 2, 3, 5, 6 comment
6 Michael Weisman 3 comment
7 David Tyrrell 2, 5 comment
8 Matthew Perkins 12, 17, 22, 27, 44, 45, 46, 48, 52, 56, 59, 61 comment
9 Mark Crocker 3 comment
10 Jay Sulzberger, New Yorkers for Fair Use 6 comment
11 Steven J. Metalitz, Association of American Publishers, et al. 1—74 comment
12 Brewster Kahle, Internet Archive 19, 21 comment
13 Joseph Montoro Jr. 2 comment
14 Jennifer Stisa Granick, The Wireless Alliance and Robert Pinkerton 3 comment
exhibit A
15 Tim Marman 1 comment
16 Kembrew McLeod, University of Iowa 5 comment
17 Veni Markovski 3 comment
18 Sandra Aistars, Time Warner Inc. 1, 2, 4, 5, >8 comment
19 Jonathan Butler